USPTO serial 78705929
PEAK DEALERSHIP PERFORMANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 6, 2007
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with PEAK DEALERSHIP PERFORMANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rodgers and Associates Performance Consulting
Milwaukee, WI
Other trademarks owned by Rodgers and Associates Performance Consulting
Rodgers and Associates Performance Consulting
Milwaukee, WI
Other trademarks owned by Rodgers and Associates Performance Consulting
Rodgers and Associates Performance Consulting
Milwaukee, WI
Other trademarks owned by Rodgers and Associates Performance Consulting
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John P. Fredrickson
John P. Fredrickson BOYLE FREDRICKSON, S.C.840 N. Plankinton Ave.MILWAUKEE, WI 53203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | MOTIVATIONAL SPEAKING AND COMPETENCY BASED TRAINING INCLUDING THE DISTRIBUTION OF COURSE MATERIALS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH | ACTIVE | Jul 31, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rodgers and Associates Performance Consulting
- Other trademarks owned by Rodgers and Associates Performance Consulting
- Other trademarks owned by Rodgers and Associates Performance Consulting
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named PEAK DEALERSHIP PERFORMANCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 4, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 4, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 26, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Aug 9, 2008 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 28, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 15, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |