Drawing for L.A.T.

USPTO serial 78706200

L.A.T.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JUN, WON KYUNG WENDY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with L.A.T.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cathleen F. Baraloto

Cathleen F. Baraloto Faegre & Benson LLP90 South Seventh Street2200 Wells Fargo CenterMinneapolis, MN 55402-3901

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Publications, namely, books, magazines, pamphlets, brochures, circulars, all featuring information regarding the telecommunications industryACTIVE—
038WIRELESS BROADBAND COMMUNICATION SERVICES; SATELLITE TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, SATELLITE TRANSMISSION SERVICES; ELECTRONIC DATA TRANSMISSION, NAMELY, PROVIDING COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS AND DATA TRANSMISSION SERVICES VIA RADIO AT REMOTE LOCATIONS; WIRELESS ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AND DATA; WIRELESS ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATAACTIVE—
042INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CONSULTING; LEGAL SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS; COMPUTER CONSULTING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE CONSULTING; TECHNOLOGICAL CONSULTING IN THE TECHNOLOGY FIELD OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 12, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 21, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 21, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 17, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 17, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 17, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 20, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 20, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 20, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 11, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 19, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 19, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 15, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 15, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 29, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 9, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 9, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 6, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 20, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 28, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 8, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 19, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 4, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 29, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 22, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 22, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 14, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 20, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 9, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance