USPTO serial 78706536
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
100 64 STOCKHOLM, SE
STOCKHOLM, SE
102 45 Stockholm, SE
102 45 Stockholm, SE
102 45 Stockholm, SE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
Lawrence E. Abelman ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 Third Avenue 10th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Computerized database management, electronic data management, electronic file management and electronic file processing services; advertising and advertising services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Streaming of video material, namely, film and general interest programs via computer networks; computer-aided transmission of images, messages and sound | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Providing electronic verification of on-line orders of digital content and generating electronic permission codes which the allow users to access said digital content; computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 16, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 13, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 19, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 11, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 28, 2008 | ADBS | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; NEW BASIS REQUESTED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 19, 2008 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 28, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 17, 2007 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 2, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 2, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |