Drawing for HORIZON CAREER

USPTO serial 78706610

HORIZON CAREER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ESTRADA, LINDA M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HORIZON CAREER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Recruiting, placement, staffing and career networking services; Providing career information via world wide web internet global computer networkACTIVEJul 1, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 25, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 10, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 10, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 21, 2008GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 21, 2008GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 21, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Apr 4, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 18, 2008GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2008GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 14, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 14, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 14, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 4, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 2007ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 20, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 20, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 29, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 28, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 28, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 23, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 15, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 12, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 12, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 12, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 24, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance