Drawing for THE SIMPLE CHEF

USPTO serial 78706864

THE SIMPLE CHEF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with THE SIMPLE CHEF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Conducting entertainment exhibitions in the nature of cooking; Conducting workshops and seminars in the art of simple cooking; Direction of making radio or television programs; Editing or recording of sounds and images; Entertainment in the nature of on-going television programs in the field of the simple art of cooking; Entertainment services, namely, personal appearances by The Simple Chef, Chef DonClark; Entertainment services, namely, providing a television program in the field of the art of simple cooking via a global computer network; Entertainment services, namely, conducting parties; Entertainment services, namely, wine tastings; Entertainment services namely live, televised and movie appearances by a professional entertainer; Entertainment services, namely, conducting parties for the purpose of dating and social introduction for adults; Multimedia entertainment software production services Party Planning; Production of cable television programs; Production of video discs for others; Programming The Simple Chef with Chef DonClark on a global computer network; Special events planning; Television production; Online journals, namely, blogs featuring the art of simple cooking; Electronic publishing services, namely, publication of text and graphic works of others on DVD featuring the art of simple cookingACTIVEDec 23, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 20, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 20, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 24, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 16, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance