USPTO serial 78706879
PEBBLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNYDER, NELSON B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PEBBLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward P. Kelly
EDWARD P KELLY TIAJOLOFF & KELLY405 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10174-0002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Signal intelligence system comprised of satellites, satellite receivers, radio receivers and computer hardware for remotely detecting and monitoring radio frequency activity | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 13, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 19, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 30, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 6, 2009 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 22, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 5, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |