Drawing for SMOKE

USPTO serial 78706972

SMOKE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHELI, ANGELA M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMOKE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Samuel Fifer

SAMUEL FIFER SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHAL LLPWACKER DR STATION, SEARS TWRPO BOX #061080CHICAGO, IL 60606-1080

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Denim jackets; Head scarves; Headwear; Jackets; Jerseys ; Leather jackets; Pants; Polo shirts; Shirts; Shorts; Skirts; Sweat shirts; T-shirts; Tank tops; UnderwearACTIVEApr 27, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 6, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 6, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 4, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 21, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 11, 2008GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 11, 2008GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 11, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Mar 19, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 12, 2007GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2007GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 23, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 8, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 19, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 5, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 5, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 5, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 5, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 5, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 22, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance