Drawing for QUEST

USPTO serial 78707055

QUEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TENG, SIMON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QUEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas R. Bush

DOUGLAS R. BUSH ARENT FOX PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5303UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Custom development of informational, interactive kiosks containing driving directions; custom design of maps; customized mapping services; computer services, namely, providing map enablement for the websites of otherACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 17, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 17, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 7, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 22, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 21, 2012EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 17, 2012EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 17, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 6, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 17, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 17, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 17, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 16, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 14, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 14, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 23, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 17, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 17, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 3, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 2, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 27, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 7, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 7, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 6, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 23, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 17, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 5, 2009TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Oct 5, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 5, 2009OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Mar 11, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 16, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 15, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 27, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 5, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 5, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 16, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 8, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 28, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance