Drawing for ASIMCO TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 78707093

ASIMCO TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ASIMCO TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nancy Sabarra

NANCY SABARRA FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007air compressors; air compressors for land vehicles; water pumps for land vehicles; water pumps for use in motors and engines; water pump hubs and water pump outlets used for engines; engine parts, namely blocks, heads, piston rings, piston masters, coil supports, alternator pulleys, and armatures of alternators; engine parts, namely inlet and exhaust valves; parts of fuel pumps for engines, namely camshafts and shafts; machine parts, namely bushings and bushing assembliesACTIVE—
012braking system for vehicles and parts thereof, namely covers, valve bodies, brake cups, brake grommets, slack adjustors, packing cups, grommets, and gaskets; brake pedal brackets for land vehicles; brake calipers for land vehicles; brake cylinders; brake cylinder bodies; front suspension systems for automobiles; front suspension systems for boats; motorcycle wheels; top mounts for automobile chassis; parts of braking systems for vehicles, namely brake valvesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 20, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 20, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 12, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 12, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 8, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 8, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 28, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 12, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 12, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 22, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 22, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 22, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 13, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 13, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 13, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 19, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 27, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 7, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 4, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 28, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 25, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 5, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 4, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 24, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 24, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 23, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 23, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 19, 2005AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance