USPTO serial 78707285
FAIR TRADE CERTIFIED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FAIR TRADE CERTIFIED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew J. Ferren
Andrew J. Ferren GOULSTON & STORRS, P.C.400 ATLANTIC AVEBOSTON, MA 02110-3333UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | Apparel, clothing, soy milk, milk, cereal, apples, apricots, banana chips, banana puree, berries, cantaloupe, fruit juice, guava, fruit salad, lemons, limes, nectarines, papaya, peaches, pears, plums raisins, asparagus, bell peppers, spinach, squash, tomatoes, cotton, plants, macadamia nuts, peanuts, cashews, and sesame seeds | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 9, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 14, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 22, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 20, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 15, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 5, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 13, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |