USPTO serial 78707690
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
TORONTO ONTARIO, CA
TORONTO ONTARIO, CA
TORONTO ONTARIO, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DARYL W SCHNURR
DARYL W SCHNURR MILLER THOMSON LLP295 Hagey Blvd.SUITE 300KITCHENER, ONTARIO, N2L6R5| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Cosmetics and body care products, namely, perfumed powders, hair and body dusts, hair and body powder fragrances, hair powders, body powders(4/19/05 - 04/21/05) Cosmetics and body care products, namely, makeup, hand, face and body lotions, hair, face and body mists, hair, face and body sprays, hair face and body creams, hair, face and body oils, nail polishes, hair, face and body fragrances, perfumes, hair, face and body gels, face and body moisturizers, face and body cleansers, face and body masks, sun blocks, sunscreens, talcum powders, hair, face and skin emollients, toners, hair, face and body clarifiers, skin cleansing froths for the bath and shower, hair, face and body mousse, shampoos, conditioners, hair, face and body scrubs and soaps | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 21, 2005 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 24, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 20, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 27, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 2, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 2, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 21, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 7, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 5, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 20, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |