USPTO serial 78707777
RAPIDO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RAPIDO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Villa del Conte (Padova), IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas S. Baker, Jr.
THOMAS S BAKER JR THOMAS S BAKER, JR, ATTORNEY AT LAW, L1371 W 3RD AVECOLUMBUS, OH 43212-2900UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Tissues for cleaning purposes, namely, pre-moistened towelettes for cleaning; cleaning equipment and instruments, namely, bucket holder, carry basket, paper holder, holder for window squeegees, spare sleeve and scrapers, holders for plastic bags, handle, telescopic handle, bag holder, dustpan, paper holder, paper roll holder, frame for mop, cloths, cloths for household cleaning, cloths for cleaning windows, frames for cloths, wet mop holders, bonnet mop; hand-operated cleaning instruments, hand tools and hand-operated implements for cleaning, namely, wringer, nipper, broom with tank, dust mop frames, V-sweeper; cleaning instruments and machines, namely, dustpan; non-electric instruments and materials, all for cleaning, namely, wax applicator, scrubbing brushes; cleaning materials, namely, mop, sponges, microfiber cloths, cotton gauzes, dust mop heads; hand-operated devices for dispensing cleaning preparations, namely, soap dispenser, deodorant and disinfectant dispenser; cleaning-preparation dispenser; articles for cleaning purposes, namely, trolley, bag holding trolley, laundry trolley, wringer, bucket, safety sign of cleaning, plastic chain fitting safety sign of cleaning, window squeegee, window washer, cobweb head, duster, brush, scraper, broom, container for rubbish, cage for deodorant or disinfectant, floor squeegee; feather-dusters; carpet-beaters; buckets; polishing gloves | ACTIVE | Oct 15, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 26, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 26, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 29, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |