USPTO serial 78708294
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kimberly Gambrel
KIMBERLY GAMBREL DINSMORE & SHOHL LLPONE DAYTON CTR ONE S MAIN STDAYTON, OH 45402-2023UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | pharmaceuticals | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | drug and pharmaceutical commercialisation services; business management; business administration; business assistance to biotechnology organisations; provision of information, consultancy and advice relating to all the aforesaid | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | provision of finance, financial advice and financial consultancy services all for the development and support of technology transfer, provision of finance and investment for pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies and for drug development; provision of information, consultancy and advice relating to all the aforesaid | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | drug, pharmaceutical and biotechnology development and research services; scientific, industrial and medical research; licensing and exploitation of intellectual property; licensing of research and development; provision of information, consultancy and advice relating to all the aforesaid | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 17, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |