USPTO serial 78708598
MERCENARIES: WORLD IN FLAMES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DINALLO, KEVIN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MERCENARIES: WORLD IN FLAMES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Connie L. Ellerbach
CONNIE L ELLERBACH FENWICK & WEST LLPSILICON VALLEY CTR801 CALIFORNIA STMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and video game programs; computer game software; video game software; downloadable computer and video game software; computer and video game cartridges, CD-ROMS, discs and tapes featuring video games and user manuals sold as a unit therewith; interactive entertainment computer game software; interactive video game programs; interactive computer game programs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2008 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 17, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 14, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 6, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 14, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |