CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for Serial No. 78708795

USPTO serial 78708795

Serial No. 78708795

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 78708795?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joan Optican Herman and Thomas B. Luebbering

Joan Optican Herman and Thomas B. Luebbering Hovey Williams LLP10801 Mastin Blvd., Suite 100084 Corporate WoodsOverland Park, KS 66210

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Greeting cards with food items or food related items and home and personal accessories enclosed, namely, picture frames, jewelry, beads, make-up, and toys baked goods, meat, cheese, fruit, nuts, coffees, liqueurs, and decorative food-related giftsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 25, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 25, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 25, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 7, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 20, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 26, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 26, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 26, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 26, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 3, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 13, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 15, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 11, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 8, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 7, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 7, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 26, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance