USPTO serial 78708891
INTELLIGENT RETINAL IMPLANT SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4210483Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 18, 2012
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INTELLIGENT RETINAL IMPLANT SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
IMI Intelligent Medical Implants AG
Zug, CH
Other trademarks owned by IMI Intelligent Medical Implants AG
IMI Intelligent Medical Implants AG
Zug, CH
Other trademarks owned by IMI Intelligent Medical Implants AG
IMI Intelligent Medical Implants AG
Zug, CH
Other trademarks owned by IMI Intelligent Medical Implants AG
PARIS, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. Jackson
DAVID A. JACKSON KLAUBER & JACKSON LLC25 East Spring Valley Avenue, Suite 160Bergen FourMaywood, NJ 07607Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | rental of medical equipment; internet services, namely, providing medical data relating to patients and/or implants; internet services, namely, providing technical medical data relating to patients and/or implants | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 16, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IMI Intelligent Medical Implants AG
- Other trademarks owned by IMI Intelligent Medical Implants AG
- Other trademarks owned by IMI Intelligent Medical Implants AG
- Other trademarks owned by PIXIUM VISION SA
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named INTELLIGENT RETINAL IMPLANT SYSTEM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 15, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 14, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 8, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 31, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 31, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 15, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 16, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 12, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 14, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 21, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 29, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 8, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |