USPTO serial 78708994
IMI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4065160Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 6, 2011
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with IMI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PARIS, FR
IMI Intelligent Medical Implants AG
Zug, CH
Other trademarks owned by IMI Intelligent Medical Implants AG
IMI Intelligent Medical Implants AG
Zug, CH
Other trademarks owned by IMI Intelligent Medical Implants AG
IMI Intelligent Medical Implants AG
Zug, CH
Other trademarks owned by IMI Intelligent Medical Implants AG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. Jackson
David A. Jackson Klauber & Jackson LLC411 Hackensack Avenue, 4th FloorHackensack, NJ 07601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | ELECTRIC AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS SOLD AS COMPONENTS OF ARTIFICIAL IMPLANTS CONSISTING OF ARTIFICIAL MATERIALS FOR MEASURING, INPUTTING, STORING, DISPLAYING, ANALYZING, PROCESSING AND TRANSMITTING DATA IN SIGNALS; ID READERS SOLD AS COMPONENTS OF IMPLANTS CONSISTING OF ARTIFICIAL MATERIALS, MEDICAL APPARATUS FOR RE-ESTABLISHING NEUROLOGICAL DEFICITS FOR THERAPEUTIC PURPOSES; ELECTROMEDICAL APPARATUS AND PARTS THEREFOR, IN PARTICULAR ELECTRONIC APPARATUS FOR THE ELECTRICAL STIMULATION OF TISSUE AND NERVES, INCLUDING EXTERNAL OR IMPLANTABLE MEDICAL DEVICES, IN PARTICULAR CRANIAL IMPLANT DEVICES, IN PARTICULAR FOR ENHANCING SENSORY PERCEPTION FOR CLINICAL MEDICAL USE; HEART PACEMAKERS; PROGRAMMING AND TESTING APPARATUS FOR HEART PACEMAKERS FOR CLINICAL MEDICAL PURPOSES; DEFIBRILLATORS; CARDIOVERTERS; CARDIAC ELECTRODES, BALLOON DILATION APPARATUS FOR MEDICAL USE; MEDICAL PATIENT ORGAN AND INTERNAL SYSTEMS MONITORING, MEASURING AND REGULATING APPARATUS; RESUSCITATION APPARATUS; IMPLANTS CONSISTING OF ARTIFICIAL MATERIALS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | ELECTRONIC REMOTE PROCESSING OF MEDICAL DATA FROM OR TO APPARATUS, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC REMOTE PROCESSING OF DATA TO AN ELECTRONIC IMPLANT AND ELECTRONIC REMOTE PROCESSING OF DATA FROM THE ELECTRONIC IMPLANT TO AN EXTERNAL UNIT; PROCESSING OF DATA RELATING TO PATIENTS AND/OR IMPLANTS FOR CLINICAL MEDICAL PURPOSES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | ELECTRONIC REMOTE DATA FORWARDING FROM OR TO MEDICAL APPARATUS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 039 | ELECTRONIC REMOTE STORAGE OF DATA FROM OR TO MEDICAL APPARATUS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | medical research in the field of technology | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 044 | MEDICAL SERVICES; RENTAL OF MEDICAL EQUIPMENT; MEDICAL SERVICES, NAMELY, MEDICAL AND CLINICAL EXAMINATIONS; MEDICAL CARE BY MEANS OF TELEMETRY, INCLUDING LOCALIZATION, FOR PATIENTS AND IMPLANTS; PROVIDING MEDICAL DATA RELATING TO PATIENTS AND/OR IMPLANTS; PROVIDING TECHNICAL MEDICAL DATA RELATING TO PATIENTS AND/OR IMPLANTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PIXIUM VISION SA
- Other trademarks owned by IMI Intelligent Medical Implants AG
- Other trademarks owned by IMI Intelligent Medical Implants AG
- Other trademarks owned by IMI Intelligent Medical Implants AG
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named IMI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 20, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 18, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 26, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 29, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 5, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 4, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |