USPTO serial 78710003
KLS BY KIMORA LEE SIMMONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KLS BY KIMORA LEE SIMMONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan Bick
LAWRENCE B HARTMAN5221 BEECH STBELLAIRE, TX 77401-3328UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Bed blankets, receiving blankets, throws, comforters, comforter sets and ensembles comprised of bed sheets, comforters, dust ruffles and pillow shams; quilts, afghans, bed linen, bed sheets and sheet sets, bed spreads, coverlets, bed skirts, bed pads, feather beds, bed canopies, pillow cases, covers, and shams, mattress covers and pads, covers for cushions, duvets and duvet covers, eiderdowns and eiderdown covers; blankets for outdoor use; lap rugs; diaper changing mats; crib bumpers, crib sheets, crib comforters, crib ruffles, cloth containers for stacking diapers and blankets; golf towels; handkerchiefs; drapery and draperies, fabric valances, shrouds, poufs, swags, textile wall hangings, curtains, and tapestries of textile; kitchen towels, tea towels, dish cloths, table cloths not of paper, dust ruffles, pot holders, barbecue mitts, oven mitts, table linen, table cloths, table mats not of paper, textile place mats, textile napkins, cloth and felt pennants, towels, bath linen, wash cloths, and shower curtains; cloth banners, coasters, flags, labels and doilies; calico, dimity, damask, linen, chenille fabric, cotton fabric, fabric for the manufacture of boots and shoes, felts, foulard, flannel, flax fabrics, hemp cloth, household linen, jersey material, jute cloth and fabrics, knitted fabrics, nylon fabric, polyester fabric, rayon fabric, semi-synthetic fiber fabrics, silk cloth, spun silk fabrics, synthetic fiber fabrics, taffeta, tulle, velvet, upholstery fabrics, woolen cloth and fabric, worsted fabric, wool-cotton mixed fabrics, zephyr fabric and woven felt | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kimora Lee Simmons Licensing, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Kimora Lee Simmons Licensing, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named KLS BY KIMORA LEE SIMMONS
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 19, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |