Drawing for PERRY TRITECH

USPTO serial 78710029

PERRY TRITECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DAHLING, KRISTIN M
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PERRY TRITECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert C. Faber

ROBERT C FABER OSTROLENK, FABER, GERB & SOFFEN LLP1180 AVE OF THE AMERICAS FL 7NEW YORK, NY 10036-8443UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Commercial underwater equipment, namely, remotely-operated underwater vehicles, operating controls, and components thereof, exclusive of equipment supplied to the United States governmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 9, 2007PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Apr 9, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Dec 26, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 11, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 8, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 8, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 24, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 24, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 28, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 16, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance