USPTO serial 78710201
Serial No. 78710201
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 78710201?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julie Nichols Matthews
Julie Nichols Matthews Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon LLP225 West Wacker DriveSuite 2800Chicago, IL 60606-1229Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | BEERS; MINERAL AND AERATED WATERS AND OTHER NON-ALCOHOLIC DRINKS, NAMELY NON-ALCOHOLIC COCKTAIL MIXES; FRUIT DRINKS AND FRUIT JUICES; SYRUPS FOR MAKING BEVERAGES, NAMELY, FRUIT JUICES, FRUIT DRINKS AND NON-ALCOHOLIC COCKTAIL MIXES; PREPARATIONS FOR MAKING BEVERAGES, NAMELY, NON-ALCOHOLIC FRUIT EXTRACTS, ESSENCES FOR THE PREPARATION OF LIQUEURS; DRINKING WATER, MINERAL WATER, QUININE WATER, SELTZER WATER, SODA WATER, SPRING WATER AND TABLE WATER | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NAMELY, VODKA; DISTILLED SPIRITS; RUM; TEQUILA; WINE; LIQUORS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Caribbean Distillers Corporation International Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Caribbean Distillers Corporation International Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 19, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 25, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 10, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 26, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 20, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2008 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 20, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 26, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |