USPTO serial 78710388
FIBER-BETICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FIBER-BETICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietary drink mix for use as a meal replacement; Dietary fiber as an additive for food products; Dietary food supplements; Dietary supplemental drinks; Dietary supplements; Food supplements; Food supplements, namely, anti-oxidants; Herbal supplements; Meal replacement and dietary supplement drink mixes; Mineral nutritional supplements; Nutraceuticals for use as a dietary supplement; Nutritional additives for use in foods and dietary supplements for human consumption | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |