Drawing for GODLY SENIOR CARE - LOVING CARE AT HOME

USPTO serial 78710610

GODLY SENIOR CARE - LOVING CARE AT HOME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GODLY SENIOR CARE - LOVING CARE AT HOME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sanjay Sankaran

SANJAY SANKARAN PALMA LAW OFFICES PC45 MERRIMACK ST STE 330LOWELL, MA 01852-1715UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
045providing home-based senior care, namely, companionship services for the elderlyACTIVENov 2, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 27, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jun 27, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 27, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 18, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2007CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 9, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 9, 2006EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Aug 22, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 30, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 10, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 6, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 31, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 22, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 22, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 22, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 20, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance