Drawing for MORE THAN A FLOOR

USPTO serial 78710661

MORE THAN A FLOOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAKAI, ADA HAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MORE THAN A FLOOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William C. Silvis

WILLIAM C SILVIS KING PAGANO HARRISON1730 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 900WASHINGTON, DC 20006-4715UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Education and training in the field of floor covering installationACTIVEApr 19, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 16, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Oct 16, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 29, 2006LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Sep 29, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 20, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance