USPTO serial 78710879
Q BAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Q BAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew G. McKinney
MATTHEW G MCKINNEY KIRWIN NORRIS PA338 W MORSE BLVD STE 150WINTER PARK, FL 32789-4245UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Billiard balls; Billiard bridges; Billiard bumpers; Billiard chalk; Billiard cue racks; Billiard cues; Billiard cushions; Billiard game playing equipment; Billiard nets; Billiard tables; Billiard tally balls; Billiard tips; Billiard triangles; Chalk for billiard cues ; Cue sticks ; Pool bridges; Pool bumpers; Pool chalk holders; Pool cue cases; Pool cue cement; Pool cue chalk; Pool cue clamps; Pool cue racks; Pool cue repair kits; Pool cue tips; Pool cues; Pool cushions; Pool tally balls | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |