Drawing for SAX SELECT AUTOXPERT

USPTO serial 78710917

SAX SELECT AUTOXPERT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3246320Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 29, 2007
Examiner
CLYBURN, CARLA DIONNE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with SAX SELECT AUTOXPERT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brent E. Routman

Brent E. Routman MERCHANT & GOULDPO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Operating a quality and loyalty assurance program offered to garage owners in order to provide them with discounts, guarantees and other advantages and privileges as regards to labor, machine purchases, tools, equipment and parts for the maintenance and repair of motor vehicles all for commercial, promotional and/or advertising purposesSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 5, 2018CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
May 29, 2016REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2013NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2013C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 5, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 16, 2013E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 29, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 21, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 1, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 1, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 3, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 29, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 29, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 29, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 29, 2006ZZBXALLOWANCE WITHDRAWN-INADVERTENTLY ISSUED ACTION—
Dec 18, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 30, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 29, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 27, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 27, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 26, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 31, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 20, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance