USPTO serial 78711050
PIT BULL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PIT BULL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wayne A. Sivertson
WAYNE A SIVERTSON NAWROCKI, ROONEY & SIVERTSON PASTE 401 BROADWAY PL E3433 BROADWAY ST NEMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55413Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Ale, beer, lager, brewed malt-based alcoholic beverage containing or treated with flavoring or coloring or non-standard blending or treating materials or processes, malt liquor, porter and stout | ACTIVE | Jan 19, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 2, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 2, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 18, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 2, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |