Drawing for HOT-MAPS

USPTO serial 78711089

HOT-MAPS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOT-MAPS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew H. Swyers, Esq.

MATTHEW H SWYERS ESQ THE SWYERS LAW FIRM PLLC344 MAPLE AVE W STE 389VIENNA, VA 22180UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed matter, namely, atlases, city guides and travel guidesACTIVEMar 1, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 28, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 28, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 27, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 11, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 12, 2007GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2007GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jun 18, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 31, 2007GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 31, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 10, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 10, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 10, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 24, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 22, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 10, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 10, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 23, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 25, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 20, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance