USPTO serial 78711383
LUXWORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3266194Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 17, 2007
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LUXWORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maria Eliseeva
Maria Eliseeva HOUSTON ELISEEVA LLP420 BEDFORD ST STE 155LEXINGTON, MA 02420-1522UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Conducting marketing studies; business information services; business investigation services; marketing research services; advertising services; commercial information and advertising agencies; computerized file management; compilation of information into computer databases; personnel recruitment; personnel management consulting; systemization of information into computer databases; and psychological testing for the selection of personnel | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 16, 2005 |
| 042 | Technical project studies, namely, technical and methodology research in the fields of software application design and development, software application re-engineering and migration, software application maintenance, software/IT product development and maintenance, testing, development/delivery center organization and support, IT infrastructure, IT support, IT consulting, IT system integration, IT solution development, eCommerce, web development; consulting services in the field of computer hardware and IT infrastructure support; intellectual property consulting services and licensing; updating and maintenance of computer software; computer system and computer software design for others and software engineering; computer systems analysis; creating; hosting and maintaining web sites for others; computer programming; rentals of computers and computer software; consulting in the field of quality control; data conversion of computer programs and data; data search in computer files for others, namely, providing information at the specific request of end users via the Internet; and surveying | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 16, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 29, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 7, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 7, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 15, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 26, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 24, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 30, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |