USPTO serial 78711395
GRANGE & MCCAUL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAVACHE, LINDA M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GRANGE & MCCAUL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Colleen F. Goss
COLLEEN F GOSS FAY SHARPE LLPTHE HALLE BUILDING1228 EUCLID AVENUE 5TH FLOORCLEVELAND, OH 44115Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Sauces for dipping, namely, chutneys, relishes, gravies, cream-based sauces, meat-based sauces, pasta sauces, barbeque sauce, hot sauce, hollandaise, tartar sauce, oyster sauce, soya sauce, mint sauce and vegetable and fruit-based sauces, excluding cranberry sauce and applesauce; salad dressings; sauces, namely, chutneys, relishes, gravies, cream-based sauces, meat based sauces, pasta sauces, barbeque sauce, hot sauce, hollandaise, tartar sauce, oyster sauce, soya sauce, mint sauce and vegetable and fruit-based sauces, excluding cranberry sauce and applesauce | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2012 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 26, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 24, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 13, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 7, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |