Drawing for PRECISION COMPONENTS

USPTO serial 78711521

PRECISION COMPONENTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AGOSTO, GISELLE MARIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRECISION COMPONENTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dickson M. Lupo

Dickson M. Lupo Moore & Van Allen, PLLC100 North Tryon StreetSuite 4700Charlotte, NC 28202-4003

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007POWER-OPERATED GROUT MIXERS, GROUT FLOATS, GROUT REMOVERS AND GROUT SAWSACTIVE—
008HAND TOOLS USED FOR INSTALLING CERAMIC TILE, NAMELY, PLIERS, TILE NIPPERS, TILE SCRAPPERS, AND TROWELS; HAND TOOLS USED FOR INSTALLING CARPET, NAMELY, CARPET BLADES, SCRAPPERS, AND TROWELS; HAND TOOLS, NAMELY, GROUT MIXERS; GROUT FLOATS; GROUT REMOVERS, AND GROUT SAWSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 18, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 26, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 26, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 3, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 3, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 3, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 28, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 5, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 16, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 17, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 7, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 3, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 30, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 15, 2006GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 15, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 15, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 12, 2006PBERWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - EXAMINING ATTORNEY REQUEST—
May 24, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 19, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 17, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 17, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 17, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 17, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 17, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 5, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Apr 12, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 31, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 24, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 23, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 20, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance