USPTO serial 78711880
VAC-BLASTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3393735Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 4, 2008
- Examiner
- AMOS, TANYA L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VAC-BLASTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Denzlingen, DE
DENZLINGEN, DE
DENZLINGEN, DE
Denzlingen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Theodore A. Breiner
Theodore A. Breiner Breiner & Breiner, L.L.C.P.O. Box 320160Alexandria, VA 22320-0160UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Power tools, namely, blasting machines for blasting sand; grit blasting machines, abrasive blasting machines, shot blasting machines, sand blasting machines; portable blasting machines for grit, abrasive, shot and sand blasting; specially adapted carrying cases for carrying sand blasting machines; machine parts, namely, flexible shaft couplings for connecting hoses to blasting machines; blasting booths for grit, abrasive, shot or sand blasting | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 27, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Gunther Bohler GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by VISONN GMBH & CO KG
- Other trademarks owned by VISONN GMBH & CO KG
- Other trademarks owned by Gunther Bohler GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named VAC-BLASTER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 25, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 14, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 10, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 21, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 12, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |