Drawing for OCUCURE

USPTO serial 78711938

OCUCURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ORNDORFF, LINDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OCUCURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carole R. Klein, the firm of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, MICHAEL F. CLAYTON, JAMES R. SIMS III, RON N. DREBEN, KAREN A. BUTCHER, BRETT I. MILLER, ANITA B. POLOTT, CAROLE R. KLEIN, JOSEPH E. WASHINGTON, KRISTIN H. ALTOFF, GENE K. PARK, MEGAN K. BOWEN, BRI

CAROLE R. KLEIN MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP1111 PENNSYLVANIA AVE., NWTMSUWASHINGTON, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Ocular PharmaceuticalsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 13, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 13, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 26, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 26, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 26, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2009COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 18, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 18, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 14, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 14, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 14, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 21, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 21, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 21, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 21, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 22, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 22, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 29, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 6, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 17, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 18, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 14, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 5, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 21, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2005AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2005PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance