USPTO serial 78712072
WIRELESS VILLAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WIRELESS VILLAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Cellular telephone communication; Communication by electronic computer terminals; Communication services, namely, electronic transmission of data and documents among users of computers; Communications by mobile phones; Communications services, namely, transmitting streamed sound and audio-visual recordings via the Internet; Communications via multinational telecommunication networks; Data communication by electronic mail; Data transmission and reception services via telecommunication means; E-mail forwarding services; Electronic data interchange (EDI) services; Electronic delivery of images and photographs via a global computer network; Electronic mail services; Electronic messaging system, namely, electronic queuing services; Electronic transmission of facsimile communications and data featuring encryption and decryption; Electronic transmission of messages and data; Electronic voice messaging, namely, the recording and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephone; Electronic, electric, and digital transmission of voice, data, images, signals, and messages; Information transmission via electronic communications networks; Instant messaging services; Internet cafe services, namely, providing telecommunications connections to the internet in a cafe environment; Internet telephony services; Local and long distance telephone services; Mobile radio communication; Mobile radio telephone services; Paging services; Providing co-location services for voice, video and data communications applications; Providing electronic telecommunication connections; Providing frame relay connectivity services for data transfer; Providing multiple user dial-up and dedicated access to the Internet; Providing on-line chat rooms and electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among users in the field of general interest; Providing on-line communications links which transfer the website user to other local and global web pages; Providing on-line electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users concerning general information; Providing private and secure real time electronic communication over a computer network; Providing telephone conferencing services; Providing voice communication services via the Internet; Provision of access to data or documents stored electronically in central files for remote consultation; Satellite communication services; Secure e-mail services; Signal transmission for electronic commerce via telecommunication systems and data communication systems; Streaming of audio material on the Internet; Streaming of video material on the Internet; Telecommunication services, namely, local and long distance transmission of voice, data, graphics by means of telephone, telegraphic, cable, and satellite transmissions; Telecommunications gateway services, namely the secure transmission of data using SSL and Triple DES encryption; Telephone voice messaging services; Text and numeric wireless digital messaging services; Transmission of information by electronic communications networks; Transmission of information through video communication systems; Transmission of messages over electronic media; Virtual chatrooms established via text messaging; Voice chat services; Voice mail services; Voice over internet protocol (VOIP) services; Voice-activated dialing services; Webcasting services; Wireless broadband communication services; Wireless communications services, namely, transmission of graphics to mobile telephones; Wireless digital messaging services; Wireless electronic transmission of voice signals, data, facsimiles, images and informations; Wireless facsimile mail services; Wireless PBX services; Wireless voice mail services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 28, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 5, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 30, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 28, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 29, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 28, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 31, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 28, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 30, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 28, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 28, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 17, 2008 | NEWN | NEW NOA TO ISSUE | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 14, 2008 | NEWN | NEW NOA TO ISSUE | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 23, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |