Drawing for BUSINESSWORKS

USPTO serial 78712604

BUSINESSWORKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BUSINESSWORKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicole B. Emmons

Nicole B. Emmons Baker & McKenzie LLP2001 Ross Avenue2300 Trammell Crow CenterDallas, TX 75201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for enterprise application integration, communications software, networking software, software for use in integrating databases and applications, computer databases, computer software for monitoring computer systems and networks, software for use in e-business and on-line transactions, software for use in web services development, deployment and orchestrationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 15, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 14, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 28, 2009EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Nov 14, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 14, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 14, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 16, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 16, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 29, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 25, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 25, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 19, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 13, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 13, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 12, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance