USPTO serial 78712729
THE HOOF WORKSHOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
- Law office
- OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE HOOF WORKSHOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Francis J. Duffin
FRANCIS J DUFFIN WIGGIN & DANA LLPPO BOX 1832NEW HAVEN, CT 06508-1832UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Natural veterinary preparations for treating laminitis, founder and Cushings driven laminitis; animal feed additives for use as a nutritional supplement for medical purposes; animal feed supplements; herbal animal feed supplements; equine feed supplements; herbal equine feed supplements | ABANDONED | — |
| 010 | Orthopedic articles for equines, namely, splints and supports; orthotic inserts for equine hooves; plastic inserts for equine hooves | ABANDONED | — |
| 031 | Animal feed; herbal equine feed; equine feed; licks for equines; equine feed blocks, herbal licks for equines; equine herbal feed blocks | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |