Drawing for ORISON

USPTO serial 78712757

ORISON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHARPER JR, SAM
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORISON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John F. McIntyre, Jr.

John F. McIntyre, Jr. Popelka Law Group2166 The AlamedaSan Jose, CA 95126UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical, dental, and veterinary apparatus, namely, ultrasonic body imaging apparatus for medical diagnostic purposesACTIVENov 28, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2010MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Feb 22, 2010ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 19, 2010EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2009CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2009SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 2, 2009IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 2, 2009EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Mar 23, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 23, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 13, 2009TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 13, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 13, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 6, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 5, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 5, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 7, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 1, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Apr 1, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 1, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 2, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 6, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 6, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 2, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 7, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 7, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 8, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 16, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 26, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 28, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 24, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 23, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 21, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance