Drawing for VEET CARESSABLY SMOOTH

USPTO serial 78712940

VEET CARESSABLY SMOOTH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REGAN, JOHN B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VEET CARESSABLY SMOOTH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Lerner

MARK LERNER SATTERLEE STEPHENS BURKE & BURKE LLP230 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10169UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Non-medicated toilet preparations; cosmetic and beauty preparations; cosmetic creams and lotions; moisturising creams, lotions and gels; exfoliants; soaps; detergents; preparations containing soaps or detergents; bleaching preparations all for personal use; preparations for shaving; depilatory preparations; depilatory waxes; preparations, including creams, gels and mousses, for use before, during and after shavingABANDONED—
008Electric hair removal appliances, namely, epilators; electrolysis apparatus for hair removalABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 6, 2007ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Feb 6, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 30, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 10, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 6, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 5, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 3, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 9, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 9, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 7, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 24, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 24, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 21, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance