Drawing for SIERRA WOMAN TRADITIONS

USPTO serial 78712973

SIERRA WOMAN TRADITIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEAN, AMY C
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIERRA WOMAN TRADITIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David O. Johanson, Esq.

David O. Johanson, Esq. Bingham McCutchen LLP150 Federal StreetBOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Catalog mail order, telephone order and fax order services, and computerized on-line shopping and ordering services, all featuring office accessories, cooking utensils and accessories, children's outerwear, children's footwear, outdoor and sport gear and equipment, and accessories for the foregoing goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 16, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 16, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 27, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 27, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 27, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 5, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 5, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 5, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 16, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 16, 2006DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 26, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 26, 2006DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 11, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 18, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 29, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 2, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 1, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 9, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 9, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 26, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 21, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance