CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for LANDSOFT

USPTO serial 78713020

LANDSOFT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3243765Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 22, 2007
Examiner
BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with LANDSOFT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jonathan P. Soifer

Jonathan P. Soifer POLSTER, LIEDER, WOODRUFF & LUCCHESI, L.C.12412 POWERSCOURT DRIVESuite 200SAINT LOUIS, MO 63131-3615

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017Rubber chips or granules for use as playground coverSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDFeb 1, 2006
027Playground Surfacing, namely, synthetic turfSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJul 17, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 11, 2024ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 29, 2019ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 29, 2017CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
May 22, 2016REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Aug 5, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 29, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 20, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 28, 2013NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 28, 2013C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 28, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 6, 2013E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2010NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
May 22, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 14, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 14, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 11, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 4, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 4, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 30, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 4, 2006GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 4, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 15, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 6, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 15, 2006IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Aug 7, 2006AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 2, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 2, 2006EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 21, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance