Drawing for WMH

USPTO serial 78713504

WMH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCCRAY, RENEE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with WMH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jose Gutman

JOSE GUTMAN FLEIT, KAIN, GIBBONS, GUTMAN, BONGINI &551 NW 77TH ST STE 111BOCA RATON, FL 33487-1330UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Mechanics parts, components and assemblies for power transmission, including bevel gears, particularly straight teeth bevel gears and bevel gears made of metal or plastics, racks and round racks made of metal or plastics, bushes, worm wheels made of metal or plastics, worms and bored worms as well as worm gear units, sprockets and sprocket plate wheels, particularly simplex, duplex and triplex sprockets and sprocket plate wheels, sprockets and sprocket plate wheels made of metal or plastics, sprockets for taper bushes and taper lock sprockets, bolt on hubs for plate wheels, chains, roller chains, slat band chains and sprockets for slat band chains, straight and bent attachment plates, chain tensioners, chain tensioning wheels, chain couplings, friction free guide rails for chains, chain lubricants, belts, particularly timing and toothed belts for power transmission, open end timing and toothed belts, belts with parabolic profile, V-belts, timing and toothed belt backings, timing and toothed belt pulleys, V-belt pulleys, clamping belt plates, belt tensioners, threads, particularly lead screws, threaded nuts, and ball screws and nuts, gears, particularly bevel gear units, shaft-mounted spur gear reducers, screw jacks, and worm gears, couplings, particularly splined shafts and sleeves, splined sleeves, torque limiters, chain couplings, torque couplings, locking torque limiter couplings, flexible couplings, curved-tooth gear couplings, jaw type couplings, jaw type couplings in particular for screw jacks, locking assemblies and trantorques, clamping bushes, taper bushes, bolt on hubs for taper bushes, weld on hubs for taper bushes, cardan shafts, limit switches, three phase motors, linear unitsACTIVEDec 31, 1989

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 16, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 14, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 13, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 14, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 14, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 24, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 21, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 4, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 5, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 22, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance