Drawing for PIPELINE POSSE

USPTO serial 78713761

PIPELINE POSSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PERKINS, ELLEN J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PIPELINE POSSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Farhad Novian

FARHAD NOVIAN NOVIAN & NOVIAN LLP1801 CENTURY PARK E STE 1201LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-2314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Travel bags; carry-on bags; handbags; beach bags; tote bags; sports bags; draw-string and leather pouches; backpacks; purses; wallets; satchels; suitcases; key cases; umbrellasACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 9, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Apr 9, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 8, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 1, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 1, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 30, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 27, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 26, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 1, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 27, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 22, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance