USPTO serial 78713821
ISLAND HOTEL NEWPORT BEACH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 25, 2007
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with ISLAND HOTEL NEWPORT BEACH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $797*
Plus Government fees of $1,950
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NEWPORT BEACH, CA
Newport Beach, CA
Newport Beach, CA
Newport Beach, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carol Anne Been
Carol Anne Been Dentons US LLPP.O. Box #1302Chicago, IL 60604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, [ t-shirts, ] shirts; [ tops, skirts, shorts, pants, capris, jeans, jackets, sweat suits, sweat shirts, sweat shorts, sweat pants; loungewear; robes; underwear; swim wear; beachwear; footwear; slippers; ] headwear | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2006 |
| 043 | Hotels, resort hotels, making hotel reservations for others; restaurant and bar services, cocktail lounges | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2006 |
| 044 | Health spa services for health and wellness of the body and spirit offered at a health resort | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IRVINE MANAGEMENT COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by The Irvine Company LLC
- Other trademarks owned by The Irvine Company LLC
- Other trademarks owned by The Irvine Company LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named ISLAND HOTEL NEWPORT BEACH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 29, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 29, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 25, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 8, 2014 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 24, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2008 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 25, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 9, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 19, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 26, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |