Drawing for CRUSADER INTERNATIONAL GROUP

USPTO serial 78713886

CRUSADER INTERNATIONAL GROUP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRUSADER INTERNATIONAL GROUP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John A. Franczyk

JOHN A FRANCZYK HUSSAIN EGAN BENDERSKY & FRANCZYK430 W ERIE ST STE 500CHICAGO, IL 60610-4032UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Promotion of financial and insurance services, on behalf of third partiesABANDONEDSep 18, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 19, 2007MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Oct 19, 2007ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Oct 10, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 18, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 16, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 15, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 3, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 3, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 6, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 13, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 4, 2006GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 4, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 22, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance