Drawing for SALTIGA

USPTO serial 78713970

SALTIGA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BEN, LINDSEY HEATHER
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SALTIGA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gary D. Krugman

Gary D. Krugman SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3213UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, rainwear, sweat pants, vests and waistcoats, hooded jackets for cold weather, undershirts, underwear, gloves and mittens, socks and stockings, tights, water-resistance coats, water-resistance jackets, water-resistance trousers, water-resistance pants, suspenders, and footwearACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 25, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 25, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 6, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 19, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 19, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 19, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 13, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 13, 2009DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 9, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 16, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 16, 2008DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 23, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 23, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 23, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 19, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 19, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 19, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 5, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 5, 2007DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 20, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 20, 2007DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 3, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 13, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 15, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 11, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 7, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 3, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 27, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 24, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 23, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance