USPTO serial 78714074
PICTOVIR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PICTOVIR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Young K. Park
VIRAL GENOMIX, INC (IN-HOUSE COUNSEL)YOUNG K PARK450 SENTRY PKWY EBLUE BELL, PA 19422-2319Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical product for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 27, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 27, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 5, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 21, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 21, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |