Drawing for FAMILY FARM FRESH

USPTO serial 78714749

FAMILY FARM FRESH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DAHLING, KRISTIN M
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with FAMILY FARM FRESH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Fraser D. Roy

Robyn L. Phillips Workman l Nydegger1000 Eagle Gate Tower60 East South TempleSalt Lake City, UT 84111

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Meats and processed meatsABANDONEDJul 25, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 4, 2008MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 4, 2008ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 4, 2008OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 4, 2008OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Nov 27, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 16, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 30, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 10, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 12, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 7, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 30, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 30, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 25, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance