USPTO serial 78716760
CLARO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5537601Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 14, 2018
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CLARO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BROOKLIN, SAO PAULO, BR
BROOKLIN, SAO PAULO, BR
BROOKLIN, SAO PAULO, BR
BROOKLIN 04565-907 SAO PAULO / SP, BR
90850-300 Porto Alegre RS, BR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Manuel R. Valcarcel, Esq.
Manuel R. Valcarcel, Esq. Greenberg Traurig, P.A333 Avenue of the Americas, Suite 4400Miami, FL 33131UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telephone apparatus, telephone peripherals and accessories, namely, call processors in the nature of digital signal processors, fax machines, intercoms, mobile phones, modems, pagers, telephone answering machines, two-way radios, video conferencing phones, cameras and video screens, telephone cases, telephone chargers, mobile telephone batteries | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 9, 2011 |
| 035 | Telecommunications network management services, namely, the operation and administration of telecommunication systems and networks for others; telephone answering services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 9, 2011 |
| 036 | Telephone calling card services; telephone information services featuring information regarding telephone calling card services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 9, 2011 |
| 037 | Maintenance of telecommunications networks; telephone installation and repair services; telephone information services featuring information regarding maintenance of telecommunication networks and telephone installation and repair | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 9, 2011 |
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, telecommunications gateway services; telephone communications services, namely, cellular telephone services, local and long distance telephone services, mobile telephone communication services, telephone information services featuring information regarding telephone communication services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 9, 2011 |
| 042 | Telecommunications network design and planning; monitoring telephone calls from subscribers and notifying emergency facilities | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 9, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CLARO S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by CLARO S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by CLARO S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by BCP S/A
- Other trademarks owned by Telet S/A
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CLARO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2025 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 14, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 29, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2018 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 20, 2018 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 2, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 26, 2018 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2018 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 9, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 8, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 15, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |