Drawing for ERT WHEN COMMUNICATIONS ARE CRITICAL POLICE FIRE EMS USA USN USAF USMC

USPTO serial 78717502

ERT WHEN COMMUNICATIONS ARE CRITICAL POLICE FIRE EMS USA USN USAF USMC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KOVALSKY, LAURA G
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ERT WHEN COMMUNICATIONS ARE CRITICAL POLICE FIRE EMS USA USN USAF USMC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Travis P. Boozer

TRAVIS P BOOZER SPRINT6931 SPRINT PKWY KSOPHT0101-Z2100OVERLAND PARK, KS 66251-0001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Emergency installation, maintenance and repair of telecommunications networks, apparatus, and instrumentsACTIVEJun 13, 2005
038Emergency telecommunications services, namely, providing communications and access to telecommunications networks, computer networks, satellite networks, and wireless networks; transmitting, receiving, storing, monitoring, logging, editing of sound, voices, video, images, text, documents, data and information via computer terminals and communication networks and wireless devices; telecommunications consultationACTIVEJun 13, 2005
045Emergency response consultationACTIVEJun 13, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 13, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 10, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 3, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 28, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance