Drawing for THE MILLION DOLLAR QUARTET

USPTO serial 78718198

THE MILLION DOLLAR QUARTET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RADEMACHER, MARK A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE MILLION DOLLAR QUARTET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Grady M. Garrison

Grady M. Garrison Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC165 Madison Avenue, Suite 2000Memphis, TN 38103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016posters and postcardsACTIVE—
021glasses, cups, mugs, shot glassesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 14, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 14, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 1, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 1, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 1, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 7, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 1, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 3, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Nov 2, 2006CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 31, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 2, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 14, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 29, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 29, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance