Drawing for MODUS OPERANDI

USPTO serial 78719601

MODUS OPERANDI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3366780Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 8, 2008
Examiner
MILLER, DAVID S
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MODUS OPERANDI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Frank J. Colucci

FRANK J COLUCCI COLUCCI & UMANS218 E 50TH STNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, blazers, blouses, dresses, jackets, jeans, pants, shirts, shorts, slacks, skirts, sweatersSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDJul 4, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 1, 2012C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL
Aug 1, 2012CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Jul 30, 2012CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999
Dec 16, 2011PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Jan 8, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 5, 2007REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 5, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 31, 2007CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED
Oct 25, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Oct 10, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Oct 10, 2007EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Apr 9, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Apr 9, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 9, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 10, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 18, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 28, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 31, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 24, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 3, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 3, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 31, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 31, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 29, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance